Detecting Fraudulent Financial Transactions using Deep Learning and Transaction Log Analysis

Authors

  • A. N Babatunde Department of Computer Science and Cybersecuirty, Kwara State University, Malete, Kwara State, Nigeria
  • T. A. Abdulrahman Department of Computer Science, Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
  • S. A. Ajagbe Department of Computer Science, University of Zululand, Kwadlangezwa, 3886 South Africa. Computer Engineering Department, Abiola Ajimobi Technical University, 200255 Ibadan, Nigeria
  • K. Oladipo Nokia Solutions Network.
  • R. A. Ajiboye Department of Statistics, Institute of Applied Sciences, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin, Kwara State
  • I. I. Akuji Department of Computer Science, Kwara State University, Malete, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Keywords:

Multiple Layer perceptron, Bidirectional Long-short Term Memory, Deep Learning; Machine Learning, Fraudulent

Abstract

The financial sector has seen a significant rise in fraudulent activities, costing businesses billions of naira annually. Fraudulent transactions often involve unautho rized account access, manipulation of transaction data, or theft, leaving businesses and consumers vulnerable. This study aims to enhance financial fraud detection using a deep learning approach combining Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory (BiLSTM) and M ultilayer Perceptron (MLP). The goal is to develop a more efficient model, especially for analyzing large datasets. Transaction log data from Kaggle, containing diverse fraudulent and non fraudulent transaction records worldwide, was used for this experime nt. Data preprocessing involved imputation to fill empty entries. The architectures of BiLSTM, MLP, and the hybrid BiLSTM MLP were designed for smooth model integration and data pipeline processes. After preprocessing, the data was input into the BiLSTM mo del, which reads data in forward and backward directions. The output was passed to the MLP model layers for predicting the authenticity of transactions. The combined model was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, AUC, ROC, and confusion m atrix. The standalone BiLSTM model achieved 89% accuracy, while the MLP model scored 92%. The hybrid BiLSTM MLP also scored 92%, similar to the MLP model. Upon critical examination, the combined model demonstrated better outcome in making accurate predictions compared to standalone models.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28